The value of debate

I enjoy debate. I always have. In high school, I was constantly questioning my youth leaders about why we believed the things we did. Just ask him; he grew up with me. Why was I questioning? Because I honestly wanted to know the Truth. It was not good enough for me to have someone tell me what to believe. I wanted to seek it out and know it for myself.

After college, that same kind of hunger for the Truth lay dormant for several years. I had become part of a group that exposed me to things I’d never heard of before. It was illuminating, freeing, healing. But I started to accept what these people were telling me and stopped testing it and knowing it for myself. It’s not that it’s wrong to accept other people’s teachings, but if I am not testing it for myself, there is the danger that I could fall into heresy. Tell me something, throw a couple of Bible verses at it, sounds reasonable to me, so let’s follow that. But is that good enough? The Bible warns of false teachers (Matthew 24:11,24-25, Acts 20:29-30, 2 Peter 2:1, 1 John 4:1).

How can I be sure that what I am following is true or false? I believe the individual’s personal relationship with God and their relationship with a group of believers provide a good balance for testing and knowing the Truth. Be in relationship with a community of believers where there is freedom to dialogue and discuss topics. Everyone comes at God’s word from a different perspective and different life experiences. There is a richness and depth when a person studies the Word and grapples with issues in the context of a group. But people need to make sure they are testing things for themselves and not simply following the group. Our Christian walk is still a personal walk with the Lord and we need to allow Him to direct our lives first.

Over this past year, I have undergone a re-awakening of my old hunger to know the Truth for myself. I am finding it so refreshing to grapple with topics in my own study and in conversation with others. So many people have so many different perspectives. There is no one right or wrong point of view. I used to live in a ‘bubble’, where my perspective was viewed through one lens. Now I’m looking through various lenses and seeing the strengths and weaknesses in each. Lord, let me never get stuck in the rut where I am open to only one point of view!

That’s why I love debate. A person is exposed to all sorts of ways of looking at things. They need to be open to points of view different from their own and test what it is they truly believe. It makes people think.

Sometimes, however, there can be some interesting reactions to a person who is searching. They can be seen as one who is “doing what is right in their own eyes” (Judges 21:25), or a person who is rebellious, or has been led astray, or is complaining against leadership. But if a person is honestly seeking, I don’t think any of these statements apply. How often have I used blanket statements like these to describe someone I didn’t really know when they challenged my point of view? I’ve done this in the past and I know that it’s wrong. What right do I have to potentially falsely accuse my brothers or sisters in Christ like that? That’s not my job. I wonder how many of us have done this without even realizing that we were doing it.

Rather than viewing questioning as a negative thing, we should welcome it. Honest, sincere debate is healthy and can greatly benefit the body of Christ.

5 Replies to “The value of debate

  1. Personally I would prefer discussion to debate. The picture that I see of debate is several people who have an opinion trying to force their opinion on someone else. The other people aren’t there to listen to that person they seem to be prepared to rip that person apart. Discussion is a give and take of ideas. Nin quotes ‘the blogless one’ on her site and I have to agree with this regarding debate, “debate has some merit in shedding light but does nothing to open blinded eyes”. However, it all depends on what your definition of the word debate is…

  2. flowerlady:
    I looked up the definition of the word ‘discussion’ at merriam-webster.com and found this>
    “discussion: consideration of a question in open and usually informal debate
    I guess it all depends on how you define the words.:)

  3. there ya go…and debate is defined as ‘formal discussion’ as in planned arguements. I guess I’ve read a few too many places where people are more concerned with being heard than hearing, unwilling to hear anyone else’s convictions as being valid ones (particularly on the home-school front). I just read a great post on Intent (link on my site) about conviction and living that conviction without trying to make it everyone else’s conviction. When I read the word debate I immediately see politicians going at each other’s throats, nasty business.

Comments are closed.